Whamcloud - gitweb
- landed share_write_lock.patch from #7410
[fs/lustre-release.git] / lustre / ldlm / ldlm_extent.c
1 /* -*- mode: c; c-basic-offset: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil; -*-
2  * vim:expandtab:shiftwidth=8:tabstop=8:
3  *
4  *  Copyright (c) 2002, 2003 Cluster File Systems, Inc.
5  *   Author: Peter Braam <braam@clusterfs.com>
6  *   Author: Phil Schwan <phil@clusterfs.com>
7  *
8  *   This file is part of Lustre, http://www.lustre.org.
9  *
10  *   Lustre is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
11  *   modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
12  *   License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
13  *
14  *   Lustre is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
15  *   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
16  *   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
17  *   GNU General Public License for more details.
18  *
19  *   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
20  *   along with Lustre; if not, write to the Free Software
21  *   Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
22  */
23
24 #define DEBUG_SUBSYSTEM S_LDLM
25 #ifndef __KERNEL__
26 # include <liblustre.h>
27 #endif
28
29 #include <linux/lustre_dlm.h>
30 #include <linux/obd_support.h>
31 #include <linux/lustre_lib.h>
32
33 #include "ldlm_internal.h"
34
35 /* The purpose of this function is to return:
36  * - the maximum extent
37  * - containing the requested extent
38  * - and not overlapping existing conflicting extents outside the requested one
39  */
40 static void
41 ldlm_extent_internal_policy(struct list_head *queue, struct ldlm_lock *req,
42                             struct ldlm_extent *new_ex)
43 {
44         struct list_head *tmp;
45         ldlm_mode_t req_mode = req->l_req_mode;
46         __u64 req_start = req->l_req_extent.start;
47         __u64 req_end = req->l_req_extent.end;
48         int conflicting = 0;
49         ENTRY;
50
51         lockmode_verify(req_mode);
52
53         list_for_each(tmp, queue) {
54                 struct ldlm_lock *lock;
55                 struct ldlm_extent *l_extent;
56
57                 lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock, l_res_link);
58                 l_extent = &lock->l_policy_data.l_extent;
59
60                 if (new_ex->start == req_start && new_ex->end == req_end) {
61                         EXIT;
62                         return;
63                 }
64
65                 /* Don't conflict with ourselves */
66                 if (req == lock)
67                         continue;
68
69                 /* Locks are compatible, overlap doesn't matter */
70                 /* Until bug 20 is fixed, try to avoid granting overlapping
71                  * locks on one client (they take a long time to cancel) */
72                 if (lockmode_compat(lock->l_req_mode, req_mode) &&
73                     lock->l_export != req->l_export)
74                         continue;
75
76                 /* If this is a high-traffic lock, don't grow downwards at all
77                  * or grow upwards too much */
78                 ++conflicting;
79                 if (conflicting > 4)
80                         new_ex->start = req_start;
81
82                 /* If lock doesn't overlap new_ex, skip it. */
83                 if (l_extent->end < new_ex->start ||
84                     l_extent->start > new_ex->end)
85                         continue;
86
87                 /* Locks conflicting in requested extents and we can't satisfy
88                  * both locks, so ignore it.  Either we will ping-pong this
89                  * extent (we would regardless of what extent we granted) or
90                  * lock is unused and it shouldn't limit our extent growth. */
91                 if (lock->l_req_extent.end >= req_start &&
92                     lock->l_req_extent.start <= req_end)
93                         continue;
94
95                 /* We grow extents downwards only as far as they don't overlap
96                  * with already-granted locks, on the assumtion that clients
97                  * will be writing beyond the initial requested end and would
98                  * then need to enqueue a new lock beyond previous request.
99                  * l_req_extent->end strictly < req_start, checked above. */
100                 if (l_extent->start < req_start && new_ex->start != req_start) {
101                         if (l_extent->end >= req_start)
102                                 new_ex->start = req_start;
103                         else
104                                 new_ex->start = min(l_extent->end+1, req_start);
105                 }
106
107                 /* If we need to cancel this lock anyways because our request
108                  * overlaps the granted lock, we grow up to its requested
109                  * extent start instead of limiting this extent, assuming that
110                  * clients are writing forwards and the lock had over grown
111                  * its extent downwards before we enqueued our request. */
112                 if (l_extent->end > req_end) {
113                         if (l_extent->start <= req_end)
114                                 new_ex->end = max(lock->l_req_extent.start - 1,
115                                                   req_end);
116                         else
117                                 new_ex->end = max(l_extent->start - 1, req_end);
118                 }
119         }
120
121 #define LDLM_MAX_GROWN_EXTENT (32 * 1024 * 1024 - 1)
122         if (conflicting > 32 && (req_mode == LCK_PW || req_mode == LCK_CW)) {
123                 if (req_end < req_start + LDLM_MAX_GROWN_EXTENT)
124                         new_ex->end = min(req_start + LDLM_MAX_GROWN_EXTENT,
125                                           new_ex->end);
126         }
127         EXIT;
128 }
129
130 /* In order to determine the largest possible extent we can grant, we need
131  * to scan all of the queues. */
132 static void ldlm_extent_policy(struct ldlm_resource *res,
133                                struct ldlm_lock *lock, int *flags)
134 {
135         struct ldlm_extent new_ex = { .start = 0, .end = ~0};
136
137         if (lock->l_req_mode == LCK_GROUP)
138                 return;
139
140         ldlm_extent_internal_policy(&res->lr_granted, lock, &new_ex);
141         ldlm_extent_internal_policy(&res->lr_waiting, lock, &new_ex);
142
143         if (new_ex.start != lock->l_policy_data.l_extent.start ||
144             new_ex.end != lock->l_policy_data.l_extent.end) {
145                 *flags |= LDLM_FL_LOCK_CHANGED;
146                 lock->l_policy_data.l_extent.start = new_ex.start;
147                 lock->l_policy_data.l_extent.end = new_ex.end;
148         }
149 }
150
151 /* Determine if the lock is compatible with all locks on the queue.
152  * We stop walking the queue if we hit ourselves so we don't take
153  * conflicting locks enqueued after us into accound, or we'd wait forever.
154  *
155  * 0 if the lock is not compatible
156  * 1 if the lock is compatible
157  * 2 if this group lock is compatible and requires no further checking
158  * negative error, such as EWOULDBLOCK for group locks
159  */
160 static int
161 ldlm_extent_compat_queue(struct list_head *queue, struct ldlm_lock *req,
162                          int *flags, struct list_head *work_list,
163                          struct list_head **insertp)
164 {
165         struct list_head *tmp;
166         struct ldlm_lock *lock;
167         ldlm_mode_t req_mode = req->l_req_mode;
168         int compat = 1;
169         ENTRY;
170
171         lockmode_verify(req_mode);
172
173         if (req->l_req_mode == LCK_GROUP) {
174                 int found = 0;
175
176                 list_for_each(tmp, queue) {
177                         lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock, l_res_link);
178                         if (req == lock)
179                                 break;
180
181                         if (lock->l_req_mode != LCK_GROUP) {
182                                 /* group locks are not blocked by waiting PR|PW
183                                  * locks. also, any group locks that could have
184                                  * blocked us would have appeared before this
185                                  * PR|PW lock in the list.  */
186                                 if (lock->l_req_mode != lock->l_granted_mode)
187                                         break;
188
189                                 compat = 0;
190                                 if (!work_list)
191                                         break;
192
193                                 if (lock->l_blocking_ast)
194                                         ldlm_add_ast_work_item(lock, req,
195                                                                work_list);
196                                 continue;
197                         }
198
199                         /* no blocking ASTs are sent for group locks. */
200
201                         if (lock->l_policy_data.l_extent.gid !=
202                             req->l_policy_data.l_extent.gid) {
203                                 if (*flags & LDLM_FL_BLOCK_NOWAIT)
204                                         RETURN(-EWOULDBLOCK);
205
206                                 compat = 0;
207
208                                 /* there's a blocking group lock in front
209                                  * of us on the queue.  It can be held
210                                  * indefinitely, so don't timeout. */
211                                 *flags |= LDLM_FL_NO_TIMEOUT;
212
213                                 /* the only reason to continue traversing the
214                                  * list at this point is to find the proper
215                                  * place to insert the lock in the waitq. */
216                                 if (insertp && !found)
217                                         continue;
218
219                                 break;
220                         }
221
222                         /* if a group lock with this gid has already been
223                          * granted then grant this one. */
224                         if (lock->l_req_mode == lock->l_granted_mode) {
225                                 compat = 2;
226                                 break;
227                         }
228                         found = 1;
229                 }
230         } else {
231                 __u64 req_start = req->l_req_extent.start;
232                 __u64 req_end = req->l_req_extent.end;
233
234                 list_for_each(tmp, queue) {
235                         lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock, l_res_link);
236                         if (req == lock)
237                                 break;
238
239                         if (lock->l_req_mode == LCK_GROUP) {
240                                 if (*flags & LDLM_FL_BLOCK_NOWAIT)
241                                         RETURN(-EWOULDBLOCK);
242
243                                 /* No blocking ASTs are sent for group locks. */
244                                 compat = 0;
245
246                                 /* there's a blocking group lock in front
247                                  * of us on the queue.  It can be held
248                                  * indefinitely, so don't timeout. */
249                                 *flags |= LDLM_FL_NO_TIMEOUT;
250
251                                 if (work_list)
252                                         continue;
253                                 else
254                                         break;
255                         }
256
257                         /* locks are compatible, overlap doesn't matter */
258                         if (lockmode_compat(lock->l_req_mode, req_mode))
259                                 continue;
260
261                         if (lock->l_policy_data.l_extent.end < req_start ||
262                             lock->l_policy_data.l_extent.start > req_end)
263                                 continue;
264
265                         compat = 0;
266
267                         if (!work_list)
268                                 break;
269
270                         if (lock->l_blocking_ast)
271                                 ldlm_add_ast_work_item(lock, req, work_list);
272                 }
273
274                 /* Ensure we scan entire list if insertp is requested so that
275                  * the new request will be appended to the end of the list. */
276                 LASSERT((insertp == NULL) || (tmp == queue));
277         }
278
279         if (insertp)
280                 *insertp = tmp;
281
282         RETURN(compat);
283 }
284
285 /* If first_enq is 0 (ie, called from ldlm_reprocess_queue):
286   *   - blocking ASTs have already been sent
287   *   - the caller has already initialized req->lr_tmp
288   *   - must call this function with the ns lock held
289   *
290   * If first_enq is 1 (ie, called from ldlm_lock_enqueue):
291   *   - blocking ASTs have not been sent
292   *   - the caller has NOT initialized req->lr_tmp, so we must
293   *   - must call this function with the ns lock held once */
294 int ldlm_process_extent_lock(struct ldlm_lock *lock, int *flags, int first_enq,
295                              ldlm_error_t *err, struct list_head *work_list)
296 {
297         struct ldlm_resource *res = lock->l_resource;
298         struct list_head rpc_list = LIST_HEAD_INIT(rpc_list);
299         struct list_head *insertp = NULL;
300         int rc, rc2;
301         ENTRY;
302
303         LASSERT(list_empty(&res->lr_converting));
304         *err = ELDLM_OK;
305
306         if (!first_enq) {
307                 /* -EWOULDBLOCK can't occur here since (flags & BLOCK_NOWAIT)
308                  * lock requests would either be granted or fail on their
309                  * first_enq. flags should always be zero here, and if that
310                  * ever changes we want to find out. */
311                 LASSERT(*flags == 0);
312                 rc = ldlm_extent_compat_queue(&res->lr_granted, lock,
313                                               flags, NULL, NULL);
314                 if (rc == 1) {
315                         rc = ldlm_extent_compat_queue(&res->lr_waiting, lock,
316                                                       flags, NULL, NULL);
317                 }
318                 if (rc == 0)
319                         RETURN(LDLM_ITER_STOP);
320
321                 ldlm_resource_unlink_lock(lock);
322                 ldlm_extent_policy(res, lock, flags);
323                 ldlm_grant_lock(lock, work_list);
324                 RETURN(LDLM_ITER_CONTINUE);
325         }
326
327  restart:
328         rc = ldlm_extent_compat_queue(&res->lr_granted, lock, flags, &rpc_list,
329                                       NULL);
330         if (rc < 0)
331                 GOTO(destroylock, rc);
332         if (rc == 2)
333                 goto grant;
334
335         /* Traverse the waiting list in case there are other conflicting
336          * lock requests ahead of us in the queue and send blocking ASTs */
337         rc2 = ldlm_extent_compat_queue(&res->lr_waiting, lock, flags, &rpc_list,
338                                        &insertp);
339         if (rc2 < 0)
340                 GOTO(destroylock, rc);
341         if (rc + rc2 == 2) {
342  grant:
343                 ldlm_extent_policy(res, lock, flags);
344                 ldlm_resource_unlink_lock(lock);
345                 ldlm_grant_lock(lock, NULL);
346         } else {
347                 /* If either of the compat_queue()s returned failure, then we
348                  * have ASTs to send and must go onto the waiting list.
349                  *
350                  * bug 2322: we used to unlink and re-add here, which was a
351                  * terrible folly -- if we goto restart, we could get
352                  * re-ordered!  Causes deadlock, because ASTs aren't sent! */
353                 if (list_empty(&lock->l_res_link))
354                         ldlm_resource_add_lock(res, insertp, lock);
355                 unlock_res(res);
356                 rc = ldlm_run_bl_ast_work(&rpc_list);
357                 lock_res(res);
358                 if (rc == -ERESTART)
359                         GOTO(restart, -ERESTART);
360                 *flags |= LDLM_FL_BLOCK_GRANTED;
361         }
362
363         RETURN(0);
364
365  destroylock:
366         list_del_init(&lock->l_res_link);
367         unlock_res(res);
368         ldlm_lock_destroy(lock);
369         lock_res(res);
370         *err = rc;
371         RETURN(rc);
372 }
373
374 /* When a lock is cancelled by a client, the KMS may undergo change if this
375  * is the "highest lock".  This function returns the new KMS value.
376  * Caller must hold ns_lock already. 
377  *
378  * NB: A lock on [x,y] protects a KMS of up to y + 1 bytes! */
379 __u64 ldlm_extent_shift_kms(struct ldlm_lock *lock, __u64 old_kms)
380 {
381         struct ldlm_resource *res = lock->l_resource;
382         struct list_head *tmp;
383         struct ldlm_lock *lck;
384         __u64 kms = 0;
385         ENTRY;
386
387         /* don't let another thread in ldlm_extent_shift_kms race in
388          * just after we finish and take our lock into account in its
389          * calculation of the kms */
390
391         lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_KMS_IGNORE;
392
393         list_for_each(tmp, &res->lr_granted) {
394                 lck = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock, l_res_link);
395
396                 if (lck->l_flags & LDLM_FL_KMS_IGNORE)
397                         continue;
398
399                 if (lck->l_policy_data.l_extent.end >= old_kms)
400                         RETURN(old_kms);
401
402                 /* This extent _has_ to be smaller than old_kms (checked above)
403                  * so kms can only ever be smaller or the same as old_kms. */
404                 if (lck->l_policy_data.l_extent.end + 1 > kms)
405                         kms = lck->l_policy_data.l_extent.end + 1;
406         }
407         LASSERTF(kms <= old_kms, "kms "LPU64" old_kms "LPU64"\n", kms, old_kms);
408
409         RETURN(kms);
410 }