From 5ace0491c5acd9d59c05a3a947e9fb3007ae25dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: jxiong <jxiong>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 18:34:53 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 1/1] b=19188 r=pravin,rread

It is bad to access the ols_lock if the lock is detached.
---
 lustre/osc/osc_lock.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c b/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c
index ddf9a34..c9d8e31 100644
--- a/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c
+++ b/lustre/osc/osc_lock.c
@@ -1360,7 +1360,6 @@ static int osc_lock_use(const struct lu_env *env,
                 lock = slice->cls_lock;
                 LASSERT(lock->cll_state == CLS_CACHED);
                 LASSERT(lock->cll_users > 0);
-                LASSERT(olck->ols_lock->l_flags & LDLM_FL_CBPENDING);
                 /* set a flag for osc_dlm_blocking_ast0() to signal the
                  * lock.*/
                 olck->ols_ast_wait = 1;
-- 
1.8.3.1