};
static const struct req_msg_field *mds_reint_create_acl_client[] = {
- &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
- &RMF_REC_REINT,
- &RMF_CAPA1,
- &RMF_NAME,
- &RMF_EADATA,
- &RMF_DLM_REQ
+ &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
+ &RMF_REC_REINT,
+ &RMF_CAPA1,
+ &RMF_NAME,
+ &RMF_EADATA,
+ &RMF_DLM_REQ,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX_NAME,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX
};
static const struct req_msg_field *mds_reint_create_sym_client[] = {
- &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
- &RMF_REC_REINT,
- &RMF_CAPA1,
- &RMF_NAME,
- &RMF_SYMTGT,
- &RMF_DLM_REQ
+ &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
+ &RMF_REC_REINT,
+ &RMF_CAPA1,
+ &RMF_NAME,
+ &RMF_SYMTGT,
+ &RMF_DLM_REQ,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX_NAME,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX
};
static const struct req_msg_field *mds_reint_open_client[] = {
- &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
- &RMF_REC_REINT,
- &RMF_CAPA1,
- &RMF_CAPA2,
- &RMF_NAME,
- &RMF_EADATA
+ &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
+ &RMF_REC_REINT,
+ &RMF_CAPA1,
+ &RMF_CAPA2,
+ &RMF_NAME,
+ &RMF_EADATA,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX_NAME,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX
};
static const struct req_msg_field *mds_reint_open_server[] = {
};
static const struct req_msg_field *ldlm_intent_create_client[] = {
- &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
- &RMF_DLM_REQ,
- &RMF_LDLM_INTENT,
- &RMF_REC_REINT, /* coincides with mds_reint_create_client[] */
- &RMF_CAPA1,
- &RMF_NAME,
- &RMF_EADATA
+ &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
+ &RMF_DLM_REQ,
+ &RMF_LDLM_INTENT,
+ &RMF_REC_REINT, /* coincides with mds_reint_create_client[] */
+ &RMF_CAPA1,
+ &RMF_NAME,
+ &RMF_EADATA,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX_NAME,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX
};
static const struct req_msg_field *ldlm_intent_open_client[] = {
- &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
- &RMF_DLM_REQ,
- &RMF_LDLM_INTENT,
- &RMF_REC_REINT, /* coincides with mds_reint_open_client[] */
- &RMF_CAPA1,
- &RMF_CAPA2,
- &RMF_NAME,
- &RMF_EADATA
+ &RMF_PTLRPC_BODY,
+ &RMF_DLM_REQ,
+ &RMF_LDLM_INTENT,
+ &RMF_REC_REINT, /* coincides with mds_reint_open_client[] */
+ &RMF_CAPA1,
+ &RMF_CAPA2,
+ &RMF_NAME,
+ &RMF_EADATA,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX_NAME,
+ &RMF_FILE_SECCTX
};
static const struct req_msg_field *ldlm_intent_unlink_client[] = {
DEFINE_MSGF("string", RMF_F_STRING, -1, NULL, NULL);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(RMF_STRING);
+struct req_msg_field RMF_FILE_SECCTX_NAME =
+ DEFINE_MSGF("file_secctx_name", RMF_F_STRING, -1, NULL, NULL);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(RMF_FILE_SECCTX_NAME);
+
+struct req_msg_field RMF_FILE_SECCTX =
+ DEFINE_MSGF("file_secctx", 0, -1, NULL, NULL);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(RMF_FILE_SECCTX);
+
struct req_msg_field RMF_LLOGD_BODY =
DEFINE_MSGF("llogd_body", 0,
sizeof(struct llogd_body), lustre_swab_llogd_body, NULL);
* OST request field.
*/
struct req_msg_field RMF_OST_BODY =
- DEFINE_MSGF("ost_body", 0,
- sizeof(struct ost_body), lustre_swab_ost_body, dump_ost_body);
+ DEFINE_MSGF("ost_body", 0,
+ sizeof(struct ost_body), lustre_swab_ost_body,
+ dump_ost_body);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(RMF_OST_BODY);
struct req_msg_field RMF_OBD_IOOBJ =
DEFINE_REQ_FMT0("FLD_QUERY", fld_query_client, fld_query_server);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(RQF_FLD_QUERY);
+/* The 'fld_read_server' uses 'RMF_GENERIC_DATA' to hold the 'FLD_QUERY'
+ * RPC reply that is composed of 'struct lu_seq_range_array'. But there
+ * is not registered swabber function for 'RMF_GENERIC_DATA'. So the RPC
+ * peers need to handle the RPC reply with fixed little-endian format.
+ *
+ * In theory, we can define new structure with some swabber registered to
+ * handle the 'FLD_QUERY' RPC reply result automatically. But from the
+ * implementation view, it is not easy to be done within current "struct
+ * req_msg_field" framework. Because the sequence range array in the RPC
+ * reply is not fixed length, instead, its length depends on 'lu_seq_range'
+ * count, that is unknown when prepare the RPC buffer. Generally, for such
+ * flexible length RPC usage, there will be a field in the RPC layout to
+ * indicate the data length. But for the 'FLD_READ' RPC, we have no way to
+ * do that unless we add new length filed that will broken the on-wire RPC
+ * protocol and cause interoperability trouble with old peer. */
struct req_format RQF_FLD_READ =
DEFINE_REQ_FMT0("FLD_READ", fld_read_client, fld_read_server);
EXPORT_SYMBOL(RQF_FLD_READ);