1 /* -*- mode: c; c-basic-offset: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil; -*-
2 * vim:expandtab:shiftwidth=8:tabstop=8:
6 * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
8 * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
9 * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only,
10 * as published by the Free Software Foundation.
12 * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
13 * WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
14 * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
15 * General Public License version 2 for more details (a copy is included
16 * in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code).
18 * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
19 * version 2 along with this program; If not, see
20 * http://www.sun.com/software/products/lustre/docs/GPLv2.pdf
22 * Please contact Sun Microsystems, Inc., 4150 Network Circle, Santa Clara,
23 * CA 95054 USA or visit www.sun.com if you need additional information or
29 * Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All rights reserved.
30 * Use is subject to license terms.
33 * This file is part of Lustre, http://www.lustre.org/
34 * Lustre is a trademark of Sun Microsystems, Inc.
36 * Implementation of cl_lock for LOV layer.
38 * Author: Nikita Danilov <nikita.danilov@sun.com>
41 #define DEBUG_SUBSYSTEM S_LOV
43 #include "lov_cl_internal.h"
49 static struct cl_lock_closure *lov_closure_get(const struct lu_env *env,
50 struct cl_lock *parent);
52 /*****************************************************************************
54 * Lov lock operations.
58 static struct lov_sublock_env *lov_sublock_env_get(const struct lu_env *env,
59 struct cl_lock *parent,
60 struct lov_lock_sub *lls)
62 struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
63 struct lov_io *lio = lov_env_io(env);
64 struct cl_io *io = lio->lis_cl.cis_io;
65 struct lov_io_sub *sub;
67 subenv = &lov_env_session(env)->ls_subenv;
70 * FIXME: We tend to use the subio's env & io to call the sublock
71 * lock operations because osc lock sometimes stores some control
72 * variables in thread's IO infomation(Now only lockless information).
73 * However, if the lock's host(object) is different from the object
74 * for current IO, we have no way to get the subenv and subio because
75 * they are not initialized at all. As a temp fix, in this case,
76 * we still borrow the parent's env to call sublock operations.
78 if (!cl_object_same(io->ci_obj, parent->cll_descr.cld_obj)) {
79 subenv->lse_env = env;
81 subenv->lse_sub = NULL;
83 sub = lov_sub_get(env, lio, lls->sub_stripe);
85 subenv->lse_env = sub->sub_env;
86 subenv->lse_io = sub->sub_io;
87 subenv->lse_sub = sub;
95 static void lov_sublock_env_put(struct lov_sublock_env *subenv)
97 if (subenv && subenv->lse_sub)
98 lov_sub_put(subenv->lse_sub);
101 static void lov_sublock_adopt(const struct lu_env *env, struct lov_lock *lck,
102 struct cl_lock *sublock, int idx,
103 struct lov_lock_link *link)
105 struct lovsub_lock *lsl;
106 struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
109 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(parent));
110 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sublock));
113 lsl = cl2sub_lock(sublock);
115 * check that sub-lock doesn't have lock link to this top-lock.
117 LASSERT(lov_lock_link_find(env, lck, lsl) == NULL);
118 LASSERT(idx < lck->lls_nr);
120 lck->lls_sub[idx].sub_lock = lsl;
121 lck->lls_nr_filled++;
122 LASSERT(lck->lls_nr_filled <= lck->lls_nr);
123 list_add_tail(&link->lll_list, &lsl->lss_parents);
125 link->lll_super = lck;
127 lu_ref_add(&parent->cll_reference, "lov-child", sublock);
128 lck->lls_sub[idx].sub_flags |= LSF_HELD;
129 cl_lock_user_add(env, sublock);
131 rc = lov_sublock_modify(env, lck, lsl, &sublock->cll_descr, idx);
132 LASSERT(rc == 0); /* there is no way this can fail, currently */
136 static struct cl_lock *lov_sublock_alloc(const struct lu_env *env,
137 const struct cl_io *io,
138 struct lov_lock *lck,
139 int idx, struct lov_lock_link **out)
141 struct cl_lock *sublock;
142 struct cl_lock *parent;
143 struct lov_lock_link *link;
145 LASSERT(idx < lck->lls_nr);
148 OBD_SLAB_ALLOC_PTR_GFP(link, lov_lock_link_kmem, CFS_ALLOC_IO);
150 struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
151 struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
152 struct cl_lock_descr *descr;
154 parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
155 lls = &lck->lls_sub[idx];
156 descr = &lls->sub_descr;
158 subenv = lov_sublock_env_get(env, parent, lls);
159 if (!IS_ERR(subenv)) {
160 /* CAVEAT: Don't try to add a field in lov_lock_sub
161 * to remember the subio. This is because lock is able
162 * to be cached, but this is not true for IO. This
163 * further means a sublock might be referenced in
164 * different io context. -jay */
166 sublock = cl_lock_hold(subenv->lse_env, subenv->lse_io,
167 descr, "lov-parent", parent);
168 lov_sublock_env_put(subenv);
171 sublock = (void*)subenv;
174 if (!IS_ERR(sublock))
177 OBD_SLAB_FREE_PTR(link, lov_lock_link_kmem);
179 sublock = ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
183 static void lov_sublock_unlock(const struct lu_env *env,
184 struct lovsub_lock *lsl,
185 struct cl_lock_closure *closure,
186 struct lov_sublock_env *subenv)
189 lov_sublock_env_put(subenv);
190 lsl->lss_active = NULL;
191 cl_lock_disclosure(env, closure);
195 static int lov_sublock_lock(const struct lu_env *env,
196 struct lov_lock *lck,
197 struct lov_lock_sub *lls,
198 struct cl_lock_closure *closure,
199 struct lov_sublock_env **lsep)
201 struct lovsub_lock *sublock;
202 struct cl_lock *child;
206 LASSERT(list_empty(&closure->clc_list));
208 sublock = lls->sub_lock;
209 child = sublock->lss_cl.cls_lock;
210 result = cl_lock_closure_build(env, child, closure);
212 struct cl_lock *parent = closure->clc_origin;
214 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(child));
215 sublock->lss_active = parent;
217 if (unlikely(child->cll_state == CLS_FREEING)) {
218 struct lov_lock_link *link;
220 * we could race with lock deletion which temporarily
221 * put the lock in freeing state, bug 19080.
223 LASSERT(!(lls->sub_flags & LSF_HELD));
225 link = lov_lock_link_find(env, lck, sublock);
226 LASSERT(link != NULL);
227 lov_lock_unlink(env, link, sublock);
228 lov_sublock_unlock(env, sublock, closure, NULL);
231 struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
232 subenv = lov_sublock_env_get(env, parent, lls);
233 if (IS_ERR(subenv)) {
234 lov_sublock_unlock(env, sublock,
236 result = PTR_ERR(subenv);
246 * Updates the result of a top-lock operation from a result of sub-lock
247 * sub-operations. Top-operations like lov_lock_{enqueue,use,unuse}() iterate
248 * over sub-locks and lov_subresult() is used to calculate return value of a
249 * top-operation. To this end, possible return values of sub-operations are
253 * - CLO_WAIT wait for event
254 * - CLO_REPEAT repeat top-operation
255 * - -ne fundamental error
257 * Top-level return code can only go down through this list. CLO_REPEAT
258 * overwrites CLO_WAIT, because lock mutex was released and sleeping condition
259 * has to be rechecked by the upper layer.
261 static int lov_subresult(int result, int rc)
266 LASSERT(result <= 0 || result == CLO_REPEAT || result == CLO_WAIT);
267 LASSERT(rc <= 0 || rc == CLO_REPEAT || rc == CLO_WAIT);
268 CLASSERT(CLO_WAIT < CLO_REPEAT);
272 /* calculate ranks in the ordering above */
273 result_rank = result < 0 ? 1 + CLO_REPEAT : result;
274 rc_rank = rc < 0 ? 1 + CLO_REPEAT : rc;
276 if (result_rank < rc_rank)
282 * Creates sub-locks for a given lov_lock for the first time.
284 * Goes through all sub-objects of top-object, and creates sub-locks on every
285 * sub-object intersecting with top-lock extent. This is complicated by the
286 * fact that top-lock (that is being created) can be accessed concurrently
287 * through already created sub-locks (possibly shared with other top-locks).
289 static int lov_lock_sub_init(const struct lu_env *env,
290 struct lov_lock *lck, const struct cl_io *io)
300 struct lov_object *loo = cl2lov(lck->lls_cl.cls_obj);
301 struct lov_layout_raid0 *r0 = lov_r0(loo);
302 struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
306 lck->lls_orig = parent->cll_descr;
307 file_start = cl_offset(lov2cl(loo), parent->cll_descr.cld_start);
308 file_end = cl_offset(lov2cl(loo), parent->cll_descr.cld_end + 1) - 1;
310 for (i = 0, nr = 0; i < r0->lo_nr; i++) {
312 * XXX for wide striping smarter algorithm is desirable,
313 * breaking out of the loop, early.
315 if (lov_stripe_intersects(r0->lo_lsm, i,
316 file_start, file_end, &start, &end))
320 OBD_ALLOC(lck->lls_sub, nr * sizeof lck->lls_sub[0]);
321 if (lck->lls_sub == NULL)
326 * First, fill in sub-lock descriptions in
327 * lck->lls_sub[].sub_descr. They are used by lov_sublock_alloc()
328 * (called below in this function, and by lov_lock_enqueue()) to
329 * create sub-locks. At this moment, no other thread can access
332 for (i = 0, nr = 0; i < r0->lo_nr; ++i) {
333 if (lov_stripe_intersects(r0->lo_lsm, i,
334 file_start, file_end, &start, &end)) {
335 struct cl_lock_descr *descr;
337 descr = &lck->lls_sub[nr].sub_descr;
339 LASSERT(descr->cld_obj == NULL);
340 descr->cld_obj = lovsub2cl(r0->lo_sub[i]);
341 descr->cld_start = cl_index(descr->cld_obj, start);
342 descr->cld_end = cl_index(descr->cld_obj, end);
343 descr->cld_mode = parent->cll_descr.cld_mode;
344 descr->cld_gid = parent->cll_descr.cld_gid;
345 /* XXX has no effect */
346 lck->lls_sub[nr].sub_got = *descr;
347 lck->lls_sub[nr].sub_stripe = i;
351 LASSERT(nr == lck->lls_nr);
353 * Then, create sub-locks. Once at least one sub-lock was created,
354 * top-lock can be reached by other threads.
356 for (i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
357 struct cl_lock *sublock;
358 struct lov_lock_link *link;
360 if (lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock == NULL) {
361 sublock = lov_sublock_alloc(env, io, lck, i, &link);
362 if (IS_ERR(sublock)) {
363 result = PTR_ERR(sublock);
366 cl_lock_mutex_get(env, sublock);
367 cl_lock_mutex_get(env, parent);
369 * recheck under mutex that sub-lock wasn't created
370 * concurrently, and that top-lock is still alive.
372 if (lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock == NULL &&
373 parent->cll_state < CLS_FREEING) {
374 lov_sublock_adopt(env, lck, sublock, i, link);
375 cl_lock_mutex_put(env, parent);
377 OBD_SLAB_FREE_PTR(link, lov_lock_link_kmem);
378 cl_lock_mutex_put(env, parent);
379 cl_lock_unhold(env, sublock,
380 "lov-parent", parent);
382 cl_lock_mutex_put(env, sublock);
386 * Some sub-locks can be missing at this point. This is not a problem,
387 * because enqueue will create them anyway. Main duty of this function
388 * is to fill in sub-lock descriptions in a race free manner.
393 static int lov_sublock_release(const struct lu_env *env, struct lov_lock *lck,
394 int i, int deluser, int rc)
396 struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
398 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(parent));
401 if (lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags & LSF_HELD) {
402 struct cl_lock *sublock;
405 LASSERT(lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock != NULL);
406 sublock = lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock->lss_cl.cls_lock;
407 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sublock));
409 lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags &= ~LSF_HELD;
411 cl_lock_user_del(env, sublock);
413 * If the last hold is released, and cancellation is pending
414 * for a sub-lock, release parent mutex, to avoid keeping it
415 * while sub-lock is being paged out.
417 dying = (sublock->cll_descr.cld_mode == CLM_PHANTOM ||
418 sublock->cll_descr.cld_mode == CLM_GROUP ||
419 (sublock->cll_flags & (CLF_CANCELPEND|CLF_DOOMED))) &&
420 sublock->cll_holds == 1;
422 cl_lock_mutex_put(env, parent);
423 cl_lock_unhold(env, sublock, "lov-parent", parent);
425 cl_lock_mutex_get(env, parent);
426 rc = lov_subresult(rc, CLO_REPEAT);
429 * From now on lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock is a "weak" pointer,
430 * not backed by a reference on a
431 * sub-lock. lovsub_lock_delete() will clear
432 * lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock under semaphores, just before
433 * sub-lock is destroyed.
439 static void lov_sublock_hold(const struct lu_env *env, struct lov_lock *lck,
442 struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
444 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(parent));
447 if (!(lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags & LSF_HELD)) {
448 struct cl_lock *sublock;
450 LASSERT(lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock != NULL);
451 sublock = lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock->lss_cl.cls_lock;
452 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sublock));
453 LASSERT(sublock->cll_state != CLS_FREEING);
455 lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags |= LSF_HELD;
457 cl_lock_get_trust(sublock);
458 cl_lock_hold_add(env, sublock, "lov-parent", parent);
459 cl_lock_user_add(env, sublock);
460 cl_lock_put(env, sublock);
465 static void lov_lock_fini(const struct lu_env *env,
466 struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
468 struct lov_lock *lck;
472 lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
473 LASSERT(lck->lls_nr_filled == 0);
474 if (lck->lls_sub != NULL) {
475 for (i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i)
477 * No sub-locks exists at this point, as sub-lock has
478 * a reference on its parent.
480 LASSERT(lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock == NULL);
481 OBD_FREE(lck->lls_sub, lck->lls_nr * sizeof lck->lls_sub[0]);
483 OBD_SLAB_FREE_PTR(lck, lov_lock_kmem);
488 * Tries to advance a state machine of a given sub-lock toward enqueuing of
491 * \retval 0 if state-transition can proceed
492 * \retval -ve otherwise.
494 static int lov_lock_enqueue_one(const struct lu_env *env, struct lov_lock *lck,
495 struct cl_lock *sublock,
496 struct cl_io *io, __u32 enqflags, int last)
501 /* first, try to enqueue a sub-lock ... */
502 result = cl_enqueue_try(env, sublock, io, enqflags);
503 if (sublock->cll_state == CLS_ENQUEUED)
504 /* if it is enqueued, try to `wait' on it---maybe it's already
506 result = cl_wait_try(env, sublock);
508 * If CEF_ASYNC flag is set, then all sub-locks can be enqueued in
509 * parallel, otherwise---enqueue has to wait until sub-lock is granted
510 * before proceeding to the next one.
512 if (result == CLO_WAIT && sublock->cll_state <= CLS_HELD &&
513 enqflags & CEF_ASYNC && !last)
519 * Helper function for lov_lock_enqueue() that creates missing sub-lock.
521 static int lov_sublock_fill(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_lock *parent,
522 struct cl_io *io, struct lov_lock *lck, int idx)
524 struct lov_lock_link *link;
525 struct cl_lock *sublock;
528 LASSERT(parent->cll_depth == 1);
529 cl_lock_mutex_put(env, parent);
530 sublock = lov_sublock_alloc(env, io, lck, idx, &link);
531 if (!IS_ERR(sublock))
532 cl_lock_mutex_get(env, sublock);
533 cl_lock_mutex_get(env, parent);
535 if (!IS_ERR(sublock)) {
536 if (parent->cll_state == CLS_QUEUING &&
537 lck->lls_sub[idx].sub_lock == NULL)
538 lov_sublock_adopt(env, lck, sublock, idx, link);
540 OBD_SLAB_FREE_PTR(link, lov_lock_link_kmem);
541 /* other thread allocated sub-lock, or enqueue is no
543 cl_lock_mutex_put(env, parent);
544 cl_lock_unhold(env, sublock, "lov-parent", parent);
545 cl_lock_mutex_get(env, parent);
547 cl_lock_mutex_put(env, sublock);
550 result = PTR_ERR(sublock);
555 * Implementation of cl_lock_operations::clo_enqueue() for lov layer. This
556 * function is rather subtle, as it enqueues top-lock (i.e., advances top-lock
557 * state machine from CLS_QUEUING to CLS_ENQUEUED states) by juggling sub-lock
558 * state machines in the face of sub-locks sharing (by multiple top-locks),
559 * and concurrent sub-lock cancellations.
561 static int lov_lock_enqueue(const struct lu_env *env,
562 const struct cl_lock_slice *slice,
563 struct cl_io *io, __u32 enqflags)
565 struct cl_lock *lock = slice->cls_lock;
566 struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
567 struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, lock);
570 enum cl_lock_state minstate;
574 for (result = 0, minstate = CLS_FREEING, i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
576 struct lovsub_lock *sub;
577 struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
578 struct cl_lock *sublock;
579 struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
581 if (lock->cll_state != CLS_QUEUING) {
583 * Lock might have left QUEUING state if previous
584 * iteration released its mutex. Stop enqueing in this
585 * case and let the upper layer to decide what to do.
587 LASSERT(i > 0 && result != 0);
591 lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
594 * Sub-lock might have been canceled, while top-lock was
598 result = lov_sublock_fill(env, lock, io, lck, i);
599 /* lov_sublock_fill() released @lock mutex,
603 sublock = sub->lss_cl.cls_lock;
604 rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, &subenv);
606 lov_sublock_hold(env, lck, i);
607 rc = lov_lock_enqueue_one(subenv->lse_env, lck, sublock,
608 subenv->lse_io, enqflags,
609 i == lck->lls_nr - 1);
610 minstate = min(minstate, sublock->cll_state);
612 * Don't hold a sub-lock in CLS_CACHED state, see
613 * description for lov_lock::lls_sub.
615 if (sublock->cll_state > CLS_HELD)
616 rc = lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i, 1, rc);
617 lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
619 result = lov_subresult(result, rc);
623 cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
624 RETURN(result ?: minstate >= CLS_ENQUEUED ? 0 : CLO_WAIT);
627 static int lov_lock_unuse(const struct lu_env *env,
628 const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
630 struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
631 struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, slice->cls_lock);
637 for (result = 0, i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
639 struct lovsub_lock *sub;
640 struct cl_lock *sublock;
641 struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
642 struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
644 /* top-lock state cannot change concurrently, because single
645 * thread (one that released the last hold) carries unlocking
646 * to the completion. */
647 LASSERT(slice->cls_lock->cll_state == CLS_UNLOCKING);
648 lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
653 sublock = sub->lss_cl.cls_lock;
654 rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, &subenv);
656 if (lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags & LSF_HELD) {
657 LASSERT(sublock->cll_state == CLS_HELD);
658 rc = cl_unuse_try(subenv->lse_env, sublock);
660 rc = lov_sublock_release(env, lck,
663 lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
665 result = lov_subresult(result, rc);
669 if (result == 0 && lck->lls_unuse_race) {
670 lck->lls_unuse_race = 0;
673 cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
677 static int lov_lock_wait(const struct lu_env *env,
678 const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
680 struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
681 struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, slice->cls_lock);
682 enum cl_lock_state minstate;
688 for (result = 0, minstate = CLS_FREEING, i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
690 struct lovsub_lock *sub;
691 struct cl_lock *sublock;
692 struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
693 struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
695 lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
697 LASSERT(sub != NULL);
698 sublock = sub->lss_cl.cls_lock;
699 rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, &subenv);
701 LASSERT(sublock->cll_state >= CLS_ENQUEUED);
702 if (sublock->cll_state < CLS_HELD)
703 rc = cl_wait_try(env, sublock);
705 minstate = min(minstate, sublock->cll_state);
706 lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
708 result = lov_subresult(result, rc);
712 cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
713 RETURN(result ?: minstate >= CLS_HELD ? 0 : CLO_WAIT);
716 static int lov_lock_use(const struct lu_env *env,
717 const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
719 struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
720 struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, slice->cls_lock);
724 LASSERT(slice->cls_lock->cll_state == CLS_CACHED);
727 for (result = 0, i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
729 struct lovsub_lock *sub;
730 struct cl_lock *sublock;
731 struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
732 struct lov_sublock_env *subenv;
734 if (slice->cls_lock->cll_state != CLS_CACHED) {
735 /* see comment in lov_lock_enqueue(). */
736 LASSERT(i > 0 && result != 0);
740 * if a sub-lock was destroyed while top-lock was in
741 * CLS_CACHED state, top-lock would have been moved into
742 * CLS_NEW state, so all sub-locks have to be in place.
744 lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
746 LASSERT(sub != NULL);
747 sublock = sub->lss_cl.cls_lock;
748 rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, &subenv);
750 LASSERT(sublock->cll_state != CLS_FREEING);
751 lov_sublock_hold(env, lck, i);
752 if (sublock->cll_state == CLS_CACHED) {
753 rc = cl_use_try(subenv->lse_env, sublock);
755 rc = lov_sublock_release(env, lck,
759 lov_sublock_unlock(env, sub, closure, subenv);
761 result = lov_subresult(result, rc);
765 cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
770 static int lock_lock_multi_match()
772 struct cl_lock *lock = slice->cls_lock;
773 struct cl_lock_descr *subneed = &lov_env_info(env)->lti_ldescr;
774 struct lov_object *loo = cl2lov(lov->lls_cl.cls_obj);
775 struct lov_layout_raid0 *r0 = lov_r0(loo);
776 struct lov_lock_sub *sub;
777 struct cl_object *subobj;
784 fstart = cl_offset(need->cld_obj, need->cld_start);
785 fend = cl_offset(need->cld_obj, need->cld_end + 1) - 1;
786 subneed->cld_mode = need->cld_mode;
787 cl_lock_mutex_get(env, lock);
788 for (i = 0; i < lov->lls_nr; ++i) {
789 sub = &lov->lls_sub[i];
790 if (sub->sub_lock == NULL)
792 subobj = sub->sub_descr.cld_obj;
793 if (!lov_stripe_intersects(r0->lo_lsm, sub->sub_stripe,
794 fstart, fend, &start, &end))
796 subneed->cld_start = cl_index(subobj, start);
797 subneed->cld_end = cl_index(subobj, end);
798 subneed->cld_obj = subobj;
799 if (!cl_lock_ext_match(&sub->sub_got, subneed)) {
804 cl_lock_mutex_put(env, lock);
809 * Check if the extent region \a descr is covered by \a child against the
810 * specific \a stripe.
812 static int lov_lock_stripe_is_matching(const struct lu_env *env,
813 struct lov_object *lov, int stripe,
814 const struct cl_lock_descr *child,
815 const struct cl_lock_descr *descr)
817 struct lov_stripe_md *lsm = lov_r0(lov)->lo_lsm;
822 if (lov_r0(lov)->lo_nr == 1)
823 return cl_lock_ext_match(child, descr);
826 * For a multi-stripes object:
827 * - make sure the descr only covers child's stripe, and
828 * - check if extent is matching.
830 start = cl_offset(&lov->lo_cl, descr->cld_start);
831 end = cl_offset(&lov->lo_cl, descr->cld_end + 1) - 1;
832 result = end - start <= lsm->lsm_stripe_size &&
833 stripe == lov_stripe_number(lsm, start) &&
834 stripe == lov_stripe_number(lsm, end);
836 struct cl_lock_descr *subd = &lov_env_info(env)->lti_ldescr;
840 subd->cld_obj = NULL; /* don't need sub object at all */
841 subd->cld_mode = descr->cld_mode;
842 subd->cld_gid = descr->cld_gid;
843 result = lov_stripe_intersects(lsm, stripe, start, end,
844 &sub_start, &sub_end);
846 subd->cld_start = cl_index(child->cld_obj, sub_start);
847 subd->cld_end = cl_index(child->cld_obj, sub_end);
848 result = cl_lock_ext_match(child, subd);
854 * An implementation of cl_lock_operations::clo_fits_into() method.
856 * Checks whether a lock (given by \a slice) is suitable for \a
857 * io. Multi-stripe locks can be used only for "quick" io, like truncate, or
860 * \see ccc_lock_fits_into().
862 static int lov_lock_fits_into(const struct lu_env *env,
863 const struct cl_lock_slice *slice,
864 const struct cl_lock_descr *need,
865 const struct cl_io *io)
867 struct lov_lock *lov = cl2lov_lock(slice);
868 struct lov_object *obj = cl2lov(slice->cls_obj);
871 LASSERT(cl_object_same(need->cld_obj, slice->cls_obj));
872 LASSERT(lov->lls_nr > 0);
876 if (need->cld_mode == CLM_GROUP)
878 * always allow to match group lock.
880 result = cl_lock_ext_match(&lov->lls_orig, need);
881 else if (lov->lls_nr == 1) {
882 struct cl_lock_descr *got = &lov->lls_sub[0].sub_got;
883 result = lov_lock_stripe_is_matching(env,
884 cl2lov(slice->cls_obj),
885 lov->lls_sub[0].sub_stripe,
887 } else if (io->ci_type != CIT_TRUNC && io->ci_type != CIT_MISC &&
888 !cl_io_is_append(io) && need->cld_mode != CLM_PHANTOM)
890 * Multi-stripe locks are only suitable for `quick' IO and for
896 * Most general case: multi-stripe existing lock, and
897 * (potentially) multi-stripe @need lock. Check that @need is
898 * covered by @lov's sub-locks.
900 * For now, ignore lock expansions made by the server, and
901 * match against original lock extent.
903 result = cl_lock_ext_match(&lov->lls_orig, need);
904 CDEBUG(D_DLMTRACE, DDESCR"/"DDESCR" %i %i/%i: %i\n",
905 PDESCR(&lov->lls_orig), PDESCR(&lov->lls_sub[0].sub_got),
906 lov->lls_sub[0].sub_stripe, lov->lls_nr, lov_r0(obj)->lo_nr,
911 void lov_lock_unlink(const struct lu_env *env,
912 struct lov_lock_link *link, struct lovsub_lock *sub)
914 struct lov_lock *lck = link->lll_super;
915 struct cl_lock *parent = lck->lls_cl.cls_lock;
917 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(parent));
918 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sub->lss_cl.cls_lock));
921 list_del_init(&link->lll_list);
922 LASSERT(lck->lls_sub[link->lll_idx].sub_lock == sub);
923 /* yank this sub-lock from parent's array */
924 lck->lls_sub[link->lll_idx].sub_lock = NULL;
925 LASSERT(lck->lls_nr_filled > 0);
926 lck->lls_nr_filled--;
927 lu_ref_del(&parent->cll_reference, "lov-child", sub->lss_cl.cls_lock);
928 cl_lock_put(env, parent);
929 OBD_SLAB_FREE_PTR(link, lov_lock_link_kmem);
933 struct lov_lock_link *lov_lock_link_find(const struct lu_env *env,
934 struct lov_lock *lck,
935 struct lovsub_lock *sub)
937 struct lov_lock_link *scan;
939 LASSERT(cl_lock_is_mutexed(sub->lss_cl.cls_lock));
942 list_for_each_entry(scan, &sub->lss_parents, lll_list) {
943 if (scan->lll_super == lck)
950 * An implementation of cl_lock_operations::clo_delete() method. This is
951 * invoked for "top-to-bottom" delete, when lock destruction starts from the
952 * top-lock, e.g., as a result of inode destruction.
954 * Unlinks top-lock from all its sub-locks. Sub-locks are not deleted there:
955 * this is done separately elsewhere:
957 * - for inode destruction, lov_object_delete() calls cl_object_kill() for
958 * each sub-object, purging its locks;
960 * - in other cases (e.g., a fatal error with a top-lock) sub-locks are
963 static void lov_lock_delete(const struct lu_env *env,
964 const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
966 struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
967 struct cl_lock_closure *closure = lov_closure_get(env, slice->cls_lock);
970 LASSERT(slice->cls_lock->cll_state == CLS_FREEING);
973 for (i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
974 struct lov_lock_sub *lls;
975 struct lovsub_lock *lsl;
976 struct cl_lock *sublock;
979 lls = &lck->lls_sub[i];
984 sublock = lsl->lss_cl.cls_lock;
985 rc = lov_sublock_lock(env, lck, lls, closure, NULL);
987 if (lck->lls_sub[i].sub_flags & LSF_HELD)
988 lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i, 1, 0);
989 if (sublock->cll_state < CLS_FREEING) {
990 struct lov_lock_link *link;
992 link = lov_lock_link_find(env, lck, lsl);
993 LASSERT(link != NULL);
994 lov_lock_unlink(env, link, lsl);
995 LASSERT(lck->lls_sub[i].sub_lock == NULL);
997 lov_sublock_unlock(env, lsl, closure, NULL);
998 } else if (rc == CLO_REPEAT) {
999 --i; /* repeat with this lock */
1001 CL_LOCK_DEBUG(D_ERROR, env, sublock,
1002 "Cannot get sub-lock for delete: %i\n",
1006 cl_lock_closure_fini(closure);
1010 static int lov_lock_print(const struct lu_env *env, void *cookie,
1011 lu_printer_t p, const struct cl_lock_slice *slice)
1013 struct lov_lock *lck = cl2lov_lock(slice);
1016 (*p)(env, cookie, "%d\n", lck->lls_nr);
1017 for (i = 0; i < lck->lls_nr; ++i) {
1018 struct lov_lock_sub *sub;
1020 sub = &lck->lls_sub[i];
1021 (*p)(env, cookie, " %d %x: ", i, sub->sub_flags);
1022 if (sub->sub_lock != NULL)
1023 cl_lock_print(env, cookie, p,
1024 sub->sub_lock->lss_cl.cls_lock);
1026 (*p)(env, cookie, "---\n");
1031 static const struct cl_lock_operations lov_lock_ops = {
1032 .clo_fini = lov_lock_fini,
1033 .clo_enqueue = lov_lock_enqueue,
1034 .clo_wait = lov_lock_wait,
1035 .clo_use = lov_lock_use,
1036 .clo_unuse = lov_lock_unuse,
1037 .clo_fits_into = lov_lock_fits_into,
1038 .clo_delete = lov_lock_delete,
1039 .clo_print = lov_lock_print
1042 int lov_lock_init_raid0(const struct lu_env *env, struct cl_object *obj,
1043 struct cl_lock *lock, const struct cl_io *io)
1045 struct lov_lock *lck;
1049 OBD_SLAB_ALLOC_PTR_GFP(lck, lov_lock_kmem, CFS_ALLOC_IO);
1051 cl_lock_slice_add(lock, &lck->lls_cl, obj, &lov_lock_ops);
1052 result = lov_lock_sub_init(env, lck, io);
1058 static struct cl_lock_closure *lov_closure_get(const struct lu_env *env,
1059 struct cl_lock *parent)
1061 struct cl_lock_closure *closure;
1063 closure = &lov_env_info(env)->lti_closure;
1064 LASSERT(list_empty(&closure->clc_list));
1065 cl_lock_closure_init(env, closure, parent, 1);