From 3dbdd38a6adcee63b6d89d4656e0099a0006f26c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mr NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:26:47 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] LU-11542 import: Fix missing spin_unlock()

A recent patch moved the spin_unlock() down into
each branch of an 'if', but missed the final 'else'.
Add the spin_unlock in the else.

Fixes: 29904135df67 ("LU-11542 import: fix race between imp_state & imp_invalid")
Signed-off-by: Mr NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Change-Id: I6ee399050aad0fe9df9c0e3ddf8ec0be8eae1641
Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/35999
Reviewed-by: Yang Sheng <ys@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Wang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com>
Tested-by: jenkins <devops@whamcloud.com>
Tested-by: Maloo <maloo@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Farrell <pfarrell@whamcloud.com>
Reviewed-by: Oleg Drokin <green@whamcloud.com>
---
 lustre/ptlrpc/pinger.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/lustre/ptlrpc/pinger.c b/lustre/ptlrpc/pinger.c
index f24e792..ae402dd 100644
--- a/lustre/ptlrpc/pinger.c
+++ b/lustre/ptlrpc/pinger.c
@@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ static void ptlrpc_pinger_process_import(struct obd_import *imp,
 	} else if ((imp->imp_pingable && !suppress) || force_next || force) {
 		spin_unlock(&imp->imp_lock);
 		ptlrpc_ping(imp);
+	} else {
+		spin_unlock(&imp->imp_lock);
 	}
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1