From e8b05eb89c75b50876ffc9e23b17811bc429fe19 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Theodore Ts'o Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2022 23:14:33 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] e2fsck: mark that we don't care about the return value of e2fsck_lookup() We only print the parent directory to help provide context to the user, but it's possible that a corrupted directory doesn't have a '..' link. Addresses-Coverity-Bug: 1507762 Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o --- e2fsck/pass3.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/e2fsck/pass3.c b/e2fsck/pass3.c index d6b8c8b..16d243f 100644 --- a/e2fsck/pass3.c +++ b/e2fsck/pass3.c @@ -324,8 +324,8 @@ static int check_directory(e2fsck_t ctx, ext2_ino_t dir, if (parent) pctx->dir = parent; else - ext2fs_lookup(fs, ino, "..", 2, NULL, - &pctx->dir); + (void) ext2fs_lookup(fs, ino, "..", 2, NULL, + &pctx->dir); if (fix_problem(ctx, !parent ? PR_3_UNCONNECTED_DIR : PR_3_LOOPED_DIR, pctx)) { if (e2fsck_reconnect_file(ctx, pctx->ino)) { -- 1.8.3.1