From ceb2cd2e055f374928b1b630eb8b61615d6d290d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: pjkirner <pjkirner>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:07:52 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] * Adjusted comment on PTL_MD_MAX_IOV now that I've got
 confirmation from Cray on this fact

---
 lnet/klnds/ptllnd/ptllnd.h | 12 +++++++-----
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lnet/klnds/ptllnd/ptllnd.h b/lnet/klnds/ptllnd/ptllnd.h
index c0fa145..812b2f5 100755
--- a/lnet/klnds/ptllnd/ptllnd.h
+++ b/lnet/klnds/ptllnd/ptllnd.h
@@ -96,11 +96,13 @@
 
 
 /*
- * *** TEMPORARY UNTIL I GET CONFIRMATION FROM CRAY ***
- *
- * It looks like there is no maxum number of IOVs for 
- * Cray Portals.  We only really require that the underyling
- * implemenation be >= LNET_MAX_IOV, so simply set that here
+ * The Cray Portals has no maximum number of IOVs.  The
+ * maximum is limited only my memory and size of the 
+ * int parameters (2^31-1).
+ * Lustre only really require that the underyling
+ * implemenation to support at least LNET_MAX_IOV, 
+ * so for Cray portals we can safely just use that
+ * value here.
  *
  */
 #define PTL_MD_MAX_IOV          LNET_MAX_IOV
-- 
1.8.3.1