From c894a0a2c8de93560912f1f0c39ba646f1d555a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andreas Dilger Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2020 03:17:18 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] LU-13797 e2fsck: quiet 'extent tree could be narrower' The "extent tree (at level 1) could be narrower" message is overly verbose and raises concerns by end users, even though it is harmless. On the flip side, this may save only a few hundred blocks in the filesystem for a short period of time, so there is relatively little benefit to be had. Disable the extent optimization step in e2fsck by default by adding the "no_optimize_extents" option to e2fsck.conf. Change-Id: I0cee9407ef0653c3b946908513f3429816b89548 Signed-off-by: Andreas Dilger Reviewed-on: https://review.whamcloud.com/40952 Tested-by: jenkins Tested-by: Maloo Reviewed-by: Wang Shilong --- e2fsck.conf | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/e2fsck.conf b/e2fsck.conf index b774f9e..3b58ff9 100644 --- a/e2fsck.conf +++ b/e2fsck.conf @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ [options] # This will prevent e2fsck from stopping boot just because the clock is wrong broken_system_clock = 1 +# disable extent optimization to avoid spurios "error" messages during runs +no_optimize_extents=true -- 1.8.3.1