From c66248f8e8b6c1570c73083c0d0319de3249490f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: adilger <adilger>
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:25:37 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Branch: b1_4 Something I noticed when looking at the OST AMD
 patch.  We should check the "ost" index and not the "stripe" index.

---
 lustre/lov/lov_obd.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c b/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c
index dc6ce4f..70e9690 100644
--- a/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c
+++ b/lustre/lov/lov_obd.c
@@ -863,7 +863,7 @@ static int lov_brw_check(struct lov_obd *lov, struct obdo *oa,
                         CDEBUG(D_HA, "lov idx %d inactive\n", ost);
                         return -EIO;
                 }
-                rc = obd_brw(OBD_BRW_CHECK, lov->tgts[stripe].ltd_exp, oa,
+                rc = obd_brw(OBD_BRW_CHECK, lov->tgts[ost].ltd_exp, oa,
                              NULL, 1, &pga[i], NULL);
                 if (rc)
                         break;
-- 
1.8.3.1