From 8e5fd7f796d80c86ca7aaebe329bee352b170812 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: shaver <shaver>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 21:42:20 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] catch up with b_devel

---
 lustre/extN/ext3-largefile.diff | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 lustre/extN/ext3-largefile.diff

diff --git a/lustre/extN/ext3-largefile.diff b/lustre/extN/ext3-largefile.diff
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..db41aab
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lustre/extN/ext3-largefile.diff
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+Under rare conditions (filesystem corruption, really) it is possible
+for ext3_dirty_inode() to require _two_ blocks for the transaction: one
+for the inode and one to update the superblock - to set
+EXT3_FEATURE_RO_COMPAT_LARGE_FILE.  This causes the filesystem to go
+BUG.
+
+So reserve an additional block for that eventuality.
+
+
+ fs/ext3/inode.c |    2 +-
+ 1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+--- 25/fs/ext3/inode.c~ext3-transaction-reserved-blocks	Sat Dec 14 18:28:21 2002
++++ 25-akpm/fs/ext3/inode.c	Sat Dec 14 18:28:21 2002
+@@ -2698,7 +2698,7 @@ void ext3_dirty_inode(struct inode *inod
+ 	handle_t *handle;
+ 
+ 	lock_kernel();
+-	handle = ext3_journal_start(inode, 1);
++	handle = ext3_journal_start(inode, 2);
+ 	if (IS_ERR(handle))
+ 		goto out;
+ 	if (current_handle &&
-- 
1.8.3.1