From: pjkirner <pjkirner>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 13:07:52 +0000 (+0000)
Subject: * Adjusted comment on PTL_MD_MAX_IOV now that I've got confirmation from Cray on... 
X-Git-Tag: v1_7_100~1^25~6^2~122
X-Git-Url: https://git.whamcloud.com/?a=commitdiff_plain;h=ceb2cd2e055f374928b1b630eb8b61615d6d290d;p=fs%2Flustre-release.git

* Adjusted comment on PTL_MD_MAX_IOV now that I've got confirmation from Cray on this fact
---

diff --git a/lnet/klnds/ptllnd/ptllnd.h b/lnet/klnds/ptllnd/ptllnd.h
index c0fa145..812b2f5 100755
--- a/lnet/klnds/ptllnd/ptllnd.h
+++ b/lnet/klnds/ptllnd/ptllnd.h
@@ -96,11 +96,13 @@
 
 
 /*
- * *** TEMPORARY UNTIL I GET CONFIRMATION FROM CRAY ***
- *
- * It looks like there is no maxum number of IOVs for 
- * Cray Portals.  We only really require that the underyling
- * implemenation be >= LNET_MAX_IOV, so simply set that here
+ * The Cray Portals has no maximum number of IOVs.  The
+ * maximum is limited only my memory and size of the 
+ * int parameters (2^31-1).
+ * Lustre only really require that the underyling
+ * implemenation to support at least LNET_MAX_IOV, 
+ * so for Cray portals we can safely just use that
+ * value here.
  *
  */
 #define PTL_MD_MAX_IOV          LNET_MAX_IOV