Whamcloud - gitweb
revert accidental deletion
authorpschwan <pschwan>
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 01:44:28 +0000 (01:44 +0000)
committerpschwan <pschwan>
Mon, 23 Jun 2003 01:44:28 +0000 (01:44 +0000)
lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c [new file with mode: 0644]

diff --git a/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c b/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_extent.c
new file mode 100644 (file)
index 0000000..f6a9f5e
--- /dev/null
@@ -0,0 +1,122 @@
+/* -*- mode: c; c-basic-offset: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil; -*-
+ * vim:expandtab:shiftwidth=8:tabstop=8:
+ *
+ *  Copyright (c) 2002 Cluster File Systems, Inc.
+ *   Author: Peter Braam <braam@clusterfs.com>
+ *   Author: Phil Schwan <phil@clusterfs.com>
+ *
+ *   This file is part of Lustre, http://www.lustre.org.
+ *
+ *   Lustre is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ *   modify it under the terms of version 2 of the GNU General Public
+ *   License as published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ *   Lustre is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ *   but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ *   MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
+ *   GNU General Public License for more details.
+ *
+ *   You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ *   along with Lustre; if not, write to the Free Software
+ *   Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
+ */
+
+#define DEBUG_SUBSYSTEM S_LDLM
+#ifndef __KERNEL__
+# include <liblustre.h>
+#endif
+
+#include <linux/lustre_dlm.h>
+#include <linux/obd_support.h>
+#include <linux/lustre_lib.h>
+
+/* This function will be called to judge if one extent overlaps with another */
+int ldlm_extent_compat(struct ldlm_lock *a, struct ldlm_lock *b)
+{
+        if ((a->l_extent.start <= b->l_extent.end) &&
+            (a->l_extent.end >=  b->l_extent.start))
+                RETURN(0);
+
+        RETURN(1);
+}
+
+/* The purpose of this function is to return:
+ * - the maximum extent
+ * - containing the requested extent
+ * - and not overlapping existing conflicting extents outside the requested one
+ *
+ * An alternative policy is to not shrink the new extent when conflicts exist.
+ *
+ * To reconstruct our formulas, take a deep breath. */
+static void policy_internal(struct list_head *queue, struct ldlm_extent *req_ex,
+                            struct ldlm_extent *new_ex, ldlm_mode_t mode)
+{
+        struct list_head *tmp;
+
+        list_for_each(tmp, queue) {
+                struct ldlm_lock *lock;
+                lock = list_entry(tmp, struct ldlm_lock, l_res_link);
+
+                /* if lock doesn't overlap new_ex, skip it. */
+                if (lock->l_extent.end < new_ex->start ||
+                    lock->l_extent.start > new_ex->end)
+                        continue;
+
+                /* Locks are compatible, overlap doesn't matter */
+                if (lockmode_compat(lock->l_req_mode, mode))
+                        continue;
+
+                if (lock->l_extent.start < req_ex->start) {
+                        if (lock->l_extent.end == ~0) {
+                                new_ex->start = req_ex->start;
+                                new_ex->end = req_ex->end;
+                                return;
+                        }
+                        new_ex->start = MIN(lock->l_extent.end + 1,
+                                            req_ex->start);
+                }
+
+                if (lock->l_extent.end > req_ex->end) {
+                        if (lock->l_extent.start == 0) {
+                                new_ex->start = req_ex->start;
+                                new_ex->end = req_ex->end;
+                                return;
+                        }
+                        new_ex->end = MAX(lock->l_extent.start - 1,
+                                          req_ex->end);
+                }
+        }
+}
+
+/* apply the internal policy by walking all the lists */
+int ldlm_extent_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct ldlm_lock **lockp,
+                       void *req_cookie, ldlm_mode_t mode, int flags,
+                       void *data)
+{
+        struct ldlm_lock *lock = *lockp;
+        struct ldlm_resource *res = lock->l_resource;
+        struct ldlm_extent *req_ex = req_cookie;
+        struct ldlm_extent new_ex;
+        new_ex.start = 0;
+        new_ex.end = ~0;
+
+        if (!res)
+                LBUG();
+
+        l_lock(&ns->ns_lock);
+        policy_internal(&res->lr_granted, req_ex, &new_ex, mode);
+        policy_internal(&res->lr_converting, req_ex, &new_ex, mode);
+        policy_internal(&res->lr_waiting, req_ex, &new_ex, mode);
+        l_unlock(&ns->ns_lock);
+
+        memcpy(&lock->l_extent, &new_ex, sizeof(new_ex));
+
+        LDLM_DEBUG(lock, "requested extent ["LPU64"->"LPU64"], new extent ["
+                   LPU64"->"LPU64"]",
+                   req_ex->start, req_ex->end, new_ex.start, new_ex.end);
+
+        if (new_ex.end != req_ex->end || new_ex.start != req_ex->start)
+                return ELDLM_LOCK_CHANGED;
+        else 
+                return 0;
+}