LU-1538 tests: cleanup test output, acc-small

[fs/lustre-release.git] / lustre / lov / lov_lock.c

diff --git a/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c b/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c
index 35548e5..1fc696c 100644 (file)
--- a/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c
+++ b/lustre/lov/lov_lock.c
@@ -1,6 +1,4 @@
-/* -*- mode: c; c-basic-offset: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil; -*-
- * vim:expandtab:shiftwidth=8:tabstop=8:
- *
+/*
  * GPL HEADER START
  *
  * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
@@ -318,7 +316,7 @@ static int lov_lock_sub_init(const struct lu_env *env,
                  * XXX for wide striping smarter algorithm is desirable,
                  * breaking out of the loop, early.
                  */
-                if (lov_stripe_intersects(r0->lo_lsm, i,
+               if (lov_stripe_intersects(loo->lo_lsm, i,
                                           file_start, file_end, &start, &end))
                         nr++;
         }
@@ -336,7 +334,7 @@ static int lov_lock_sub_init(const struct lu_env *env,
          * top-lock.
          */
         for (i = 0, nr = 0; i < r0->lo_nr; ++i) {
-                if (lov_stripe_intersects(r0->lo_lsm, i,
+               if (lov_stripe_intersects(loo->lo_lsm, i,
                                           file_start, file_end, &start, &end)) {
                         struct cl_lock_descr *descr;
 
@@ -753,17 +751,9 @@ static void lov_lock_cancel(const struct lu_env *env,
 
                         switch(sublock->cll_state) {
                         case CLS_HELD:
-                                rc = cl_unuse_try(subenv->lse_env,
-                                                  sublock);
+                               rc = cl_unuse_try(subenv->lse_env, sublock);
                                 lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i, 0, 0);
                                 break;
-                        case CLS_ENQUEUED:
-                                /* TODO: it's not a good idea to cancel this
-                                 * lock because it's innocent. But it's
-                                 * acceptable. The better way would be to
-                                 * define a new lock method to unhold the
-                                 * dlm lock. */
-                                cl_lock_cancel(env, sublock);
                         default:
                                 lov_sublock_release(env, lck, i, 1, 0);
                                 break;
@@ -929,7 +919,7 @@ static int lock_lock_multi_match()
                 if (sub->sub_lock == NULL)
                         continue;
                 subobj = sub->sub_descr.cld_obj;
-                if (!lov_stripe_intersects(r0->lo_lsm, sub->sub_stripe,
+               if (!lov_stripe_intersects(loo->lo_lsm, sub->sub_stripe,
                                            fstart, fend, &start, &end))
                         continue;
                 subneed->cld_start = cl_index(subobj, start);
@@ -953,7 +943,7 @@ static int lov_lock_stripe_is_matching(const struct lu_env *env,
                                        const struct cl_lock_descr *child,
                                        const struct cl_lock_descr *descr)
 {
-        struct lov_stripe_md *lsm = lov_r0(lov)->lo_lsm;
+       struct lov_stripe_md *lsm = lov->lo_lsm;
         obd_off start;
         obd_off end;
         int result;